Design · Frente a frente
Beautiful.ai vs Figma
Comparação lado a lado de Beautiful.ai e Figma para negócios de uma pessoa. Preços, avaliações, prós, contras e qual escolher.
Veredito rápido
Escolha Beautiful.ai.
Beautiful.ai fica à frente na nossa review (3.5/5 vs 3/5). A escolha certa para a maioria dos negócios de uma pessoa, exceto se precisar especificamente das forças de Figma.
Benchmarks
compareDetail.benchmarksHeading
Cinco eixos que importam para um negócio de uma pessoa. Cada nota é editorial, 1–10, mais alto é melhor. Nenhuma ferramenta atinge o máximo em tudo; a forma do gráfico é o sinal.
| Preço | 8.0 | 6.0 |
| Solo-fit | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Curva de aprendizagem | 9.0 | 5.0 |
| Lock-in | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| Suporte | 7.0 | 6.0 |
AI-powered presentation tool that auto-formats slides as you type, applying design rules so decks look polished without manual fiddling. For solos doing client pitches and sales decks.
A favor
- Smart slide templates auto-arrange content as you add it; the design stays clean without manual nudging
- DesignerBot generates first-draft decks from a text prompt in under a minute
- Cleaner visual baseline than PowerPoint or Google Slides without learning a design tool
Contra
- Template constraints can frustrate designers who want pixel-level control
- Animations and motion are weaker than Prezi for cinematic-style presentations
- Export to PowerPoint is functional but loses some smart-formatting behaviour
The default modern design tool. Free tier is generous, the editor is fast, and the entire ecosystem (plugins, templates, dev handoff) lives here.
A favor
- Free tier is genuinely usable for solo work (3 files, unlimited drafts, all features)
- Real-time multiplayer editing: useful when working with a contractor or showing a client
- Massive plugin ecosystem covers nearly any niche need (icons, mockups, exports, AI assist)
Contra
- Heavy for casual use: if all you need is to make a flyer or a social graphic, Canva is faster
- Pricing climbs to $15/editor/mo the moment you want shared libraries or version history
- Now owned by Adobe (acquisition completed 2024), so the long-term direction has a corporate lean
De relance
| Beautiful.ai | Figma | |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliação | 3.5/5 | 3/5 |
| Preço | Free trial; Pro ~$12/mo (annual), Team ~$40/user/mo, Enterprise custom | Free for personal use (3 files); Professional $15/editor/mo; Organisation $45/editor/mo |
| Plano gratuito | Sim | Sim |
| Ideal para | Solos who present regularly but do not want to learn a design tool. Consultants pitching new clients, B2B founders running sales decks, coaches presenting course outlines, agency-of-one operators sending proposals. | Solo designers, indie founders building products, and anyone whose work involves UI mockups or marketing visuals beyond a flyer. |
| Última revisão | May 26, 2026 | February 19, 2026 |
Conclusão
Beautiful.ai
Solos who present regularly but do not want to learn a design tool. Consultants pitching new clients, B2B founders running sales decks, coaches presenting course outlines, agency-of-one operators sending proposals.
Conclusão
Figma
Solo designers, indie founders building products, and anyone whose work involves UI mockups or marketing visuals beyond a flyer.
Mais comparações de Design
7 perguntas · ~60 segundos
Encontre o stack certo para seu negócio de uma pessoa.
Sete perguntas rápidas, sessenta segundos. Vamos combinar você com as ferramentas que realmente cabem, e dizer quais largar.
Montar meu stackAs reviews são baseadas em uso prático de cada ferramenta. Relações de afiliação não afetam o ranking. Get Stack Smart é sustentado pelos leitores.